In addition, because the tool manages the scheduling of atomics parts, it's easy to build mechanisms which can interact between themselves with the maximum efficiency. I designed the more complex parts in a couple of weeks, with a compact code (compared to RTL), which seems easy to configure and to maintain. When I had to design the complex arbitrations and the data streaming, coupled with some weeks of practice, things became easier. I started with the most simple parts of my DMA design, and after 2 or 3 weeks of practice, I'm sure I was more efficient with standard RTL language. In addition, the tool provides a lot of embedded features which are helpful when correctly managed, but which make the things even more difficult. The new concepts intoduced by the tool (atomic rules and methods scheduled by the tool) are not so easy to handle for someone which is coding in RTL for years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |